Local Surveillance Ordinances: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Other) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
* https://www.bostonhousing.org/en/Policies/Video-Surveillance-System-Policy.aspx. Boston housing authority's Video Surveillance System Policy | * https://www.bostonhousing.org/en/Policies/Video-Surveillance-System-Policy.aspx. Boston housing authority's Video Surveillance System Policy | ||
* [[Media:Srevilak-warrant-article-statement.pdf|Statement]] to Arlington board of selectmen, re: warrant article to study the use of surveillance technologies by town agencies | |||
* [[Media:Srevilak-warrant-article-statement.pdf|Statement]] to Arlington board of selectmen, re: warrant article to study the use of surveillance technologies by town agencies. | * [[Media:Cctv-code-of-practice.pdf|CCTV Code of Practice]] from the UK's Information Commissioner's Office |
Revision as of 22:00, 6 February 2017
A collection of local ordinances involving surveillance technology, and related things.
Local Ordinances regarding police surveillance
- Cambridge, MA (11/2016)
- Santa Clara, CA (2/2016)
- San Francisco's Community Safety Camera Ordinance
CCTV Studies
- Assessing the impact of CCTV. UK home office report 292.
- The Impact of CCTV: 14 case studies. A report of 14 CCTV deployments in the UK.
- What works Briefing: the effects of CCTV.
- ACLU's expert findings on surveillance cameras
- CITRIS report on San Francisco's Community Safety Camera Program. Study by UC Berkeley
- Measuring the effects of Video Surveillance on Crime in Los Angeles. Study by the California Research Bureau.
Other
- https://www.bostonhousing.org/en/Policies/Video-Surveillance-System-Policy.aspx. Boston housing authority's Video Surveillance System Policy
- Statement to Arlington board of selectmen, re: warrant article to study the use of surveillance technologies by town agencies
- CCTV Code of Practice from the UK's Information Commissioner's Office